Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulation-based medical education: Time for a pedagogical shift

  • Medical Education
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of medical education at all levels is to prepare physicians with the knowledge and comprehensive skills, required to deliver safe and effective patient care. The traditional ‘apprentice’ learning model in medical education is undergoing a pedagogical shift to a ‘simulation-based’ learning model. Experiential learning, deliberate practice and the ability to provide immediate feedback are the primary advantages of simulation-based medical education. It is an effective way to develop new skills, identify knowledge gaps, reduce medical errors, and maintain infrequently used clinical skills even among experienced clinical teams, with the overall goal of improving patient care. Although simulation cannot replace clinical exposure as a form of experiential learning, it promotes learning without compromising patient safety. This new paradigm shift is revolutionizing medical education in the Western world. It is time that the developing countries embrace this new pedagogical shift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Yaeger KA, Halamek LP, Coyle M, Murphy A, Anderson J, Boyle K, et al. High-fidelity simulation-based training in neonatal nursing. Adv Neonatal Care. 2004;4:326–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Halamek LP. Association of Medical School Pediatric Department Chairs, Inc. Teaching versus learning and the role of simulation-based training in pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2007;151:329–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. Committee on Quality Healthcare in America, Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalaniti K. Do paediatric residents have the skills to ‘lead’ newborn resuscitations? Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:592–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fawke J, Cusack J. Neonatal simulation — training a workforce for the future. Infant. 2011;7:9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ziv A, Ben-David S, Ziv M. Simulation based medical education: An opportunity to learn from errors. Med Teach. 2005;27:193–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grenvik A, Schaefer J. From Resusci-Anne to Sim-Man: The evolution of simulators in medicine. Crit Care Med. 2004;32: S56–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78:783–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The Joint Commission: Sentinel event alert, Issue 30. Preventing infant death and injury during delivery; 1995–2004 Washington (DC): Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 2004. [Cited Oct 2014] Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_30.PDF].

  11. Cheng A, Hunt EA, Donoghue A, Nelson-McMillan K, Nishisaki A, Leflore J, et al. Examining pediatric resuscitation education using simulation and scripted debriefing: a multicenter randomized trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167: 528–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Knowles M. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species, 3rd ed. Houston: Gulf Publishing; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bryan RL, Kreuter MW, Brownson RC. Integrating adult learning principles into training for public health practice. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10:557–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dempster FN. The spacing effect. Am Psychol. 1988;43:627–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006;244:400–9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawyer T, Sierocka-Castaneda A, Chan D, Berg B, Lustik M, Thompson M. Deliberate practice using simulation improves neonatal resuscitation performance. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:327–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonard M. Lessons from the sharp end: critical components of successful patient safety work. Focus Patient Safety. 2003;6:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joëls M, Pu Z, Wiegert O, Oitzl MS, Krugers HJ. Learning under stress: How does it work? Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:152–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalaniti K. In situ simulation: let’s work, practice and learn together. Acta Paediatr. 2014 Sep 8. doi:10.1111/apa.12802. [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low to high-fidelity simulation — A continuum of medical education? Med Educ. 2003;37:22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ. 2012;46:636–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beaubien JM, Baker DP. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: how low can you go? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13: i51–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Campbell DM, Barozzino T, Farrugia M, Sgro M. Highfidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation. Paediatr Child Health. 2009;14:19–23.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S Jr, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76:330–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, LeMaster T, Wears RL. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:468–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patterson MD, Blike GT, Nadkarni VM. In Situ Simulation: Challenges and Results. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65: S63–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng A, Duff J, Grant E, Kissoon N, Grant VJ. Simulation in paediatrics: An educational revolution. Paediatr Child Health. 2007;12:465–8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heitz C, Eyck RT, Smith M, Fitch M. Simulation in medical student education: survey of clerkship directors in emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12:455–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaarthigeyan Kalaniti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalaniti, K., Campbell, D.M. Simulation-based medical education: Time for a pedagogical shift. Indian Pediatr 52, 41–45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-015-0565-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-015-0565-6

Keywords

Navigation