About
Technology
Issues
FAQ
Title
Abstract
Text
Figure Captions
Table Cells
Section Titles
Keywords
Subjects
Authors
From
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1995
1990
1985
1980
1975
1970
1960
1950
1940
1930
1920
1910
1900
1850
1800
1700
1600
To
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1995
1990
1985
1980
1975
1970
1960
1950
1940
1930
1920
1910
1900
1850
1800
1700
1600
All Types
Articles
Communications
Reviews
Discussions
Case Reports
Chapters
Books
News
Editorials
Order By
Order By Year ASC
Order By Year DESC
Order By Citations ASC
Order By Citations DESC
Go
Scientometrics
Impact Factor
Discipline Ranks
H-Index
G-Index
Articles
Citations
Article Citations
Citation Distribution
Search This Journal
Overviews
Top Institutions
Top Schools
Top Authors
Prolific Authors
Top Articles
exaly
›
Journals
›
Evaluation and the Health Professions
›
Top Articles
Evaluation and the Health Professions
2.5
(top 7%)
Impact Factor
2.9
(top 7%)
extended IF
63
(top 6%)
H-Index
523
authors
1.3K
papers
22.7K
citations
4.1K
citing journals
14.8K
citing authors
Most Cited Articles of Evaluation and the Health Professions
Title
Year
Citations
Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology
2006
647
The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance
2004
539
Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review
2007
507
Prevalence of the addictions: a problem of the majority or the minority?
2011
367
A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires
2005
361
To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data
2002
355
General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
2005
331
Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response
2013
272
Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experience
2005
269
A brief history of research synthesis
2002
267
Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: overall and across demographic groups living within the United States
2010
263
Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS
2009
243
Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of U.S. adults
2012
240
Type II translation: transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings
2006
240
Development and validation of the Diabetes Care Profile
1996
235
Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review
2013
217
Emerging Adulthood: Developmental Period Facilitative of the Addictions
2014
202
Development of an Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale
1999
197
Translation in the health professions: converting science into action
2006
176
Medical Problem Solving: A Ten-Year Retrospective
1990
167
Evaluation of a Medical Faculty Development Program: A Comparison of Traditional Pre/Post and Retrospective Pre/Post Self-Assessment Ratings
1992
163
What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model?
2013
162
Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis
2001
150
Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration
2013
146
The assessment of professional competence
1992
146
0
1
2
next
How are inpact factors calculated?
The impact factor (IF) is calculated by counting citations from peer-reviewed journals only.
extended IF
also counts citations from books and conference papers. However, no patent, abstract, working papers, online documents, etc., are covered.
site/software ©
exaly
; All materials licenced under
CC by-SA
.